Science Spotlight

The Klamath River is back in the news as juvenile salmon are turning up dead, and there are questions about parasites. Here’s what’s happening.

CDFW is working closely with our scientific colleagues at the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Cal Poly Humboldt and Oregon State University to monitor Klamath River salmon and the impacts of the naturally occurring, microscopic C. Shasta parasite (short for Ceratonova shasta). This parasite is common in the Klamath and other Pacific Northwest rivers and its impact ebbs and flows with environmental conditions. Hot weather, warm water and low flows – conditions the Klamath is currently experiencing – can increase its prevalence.

On the evening of May 14, CDFW’s Fall Creek Fish Hatchery released 675,000 certified pathogen-free Chinook salmon smolts into the Fall Creek tributary of the Klamath River about 7 miles upstream of the former Iron Gate Dam location.

The release was also timed when C. Shasta levels in the river had decreased and ahead of forecasted storms, which would improve water quality and accelerate the smolts’ outmigration to the Pacific Ocean. Since then, C. Shasta levels have increased and some of these hatchery fish have been found dead in monitoring traps upstream of the Interstate 5 bridge near the former Iron Gate Dam location. Lab results have confirmed the presence of C. Shasta and another parasite, Parvicapsula minbicornis, in these dead fish. CDFW continues to track the movement of hatchery fish and remains confident that a proportion of Fall Creek Fish Hatchery-origin salmon escaped the impacts of C. Shasta and other parasites.

Additionally, CDFW tributary monitoring of wild juvenile salmon populations indicates the majority of wild fish had already outmigrated ahead of elevated levels of C. Shasta. The C. Shasta parasite does not impact ocean salmon or ocean salmon fishing.

It’s important to understand that some mortality due to pathogens is expected and is a natural part of the salmon life cycle. A pair of Chinook salmon will typically produce around 4,000 offspring but even under ideal conditions, more than 99 percent of those offspring will succumb to pathogens or predation prior to reaching adulthood. While the C. Shasta levels in the Klamath are elevated and somewhat concerning, early spring C.Shasta levels were lower than levels seen in previous drought years prior to Klamath dam removal, and C.Shasta related mortalities in the spring of 2024 and 2025 following dam removal were significantly lower, which are encouraging signs for the future.

CDFW will continue to monitor and track basin-wide conditions through the Klamath Fish Health Assessment Team as adult salmon return to the Klamath River over the summer.

###

Media Contact:
Peter Tira, CDFW Communications, (916) 215-3858

Fate has not been kind to the San Joaquin kit fox (Vulpes macrotis mutica).

Shrinking habitat caused by urbanization and agricultural expansion landed this Central Valley native on the federal Endangered Species List decades ago. California’s total population of San Joaquin kit foxes may now be down to a few thousand animals. To make matters worse, its favorite food, the kangaroo rat, is likewise endangered as the desert habitat it prefers continues to disappear.

Wildlife biologists took heart, however, in a population that seemed to be thriving within the city limits of Bakersfield. Unlike San Joaquin kit fox populations in other parts of the Central Valley range, the Bakersfield foxes adapted quite nicely to urban life. Their number – estimated between 200 and 400 animals – has evidently seemed to be holding steady and possibly increasing.

Their cute and cuddly appearance make them popular with city residents. Earlier research showed the population was healthy and genetically robust. Wildlife biologists were counting on those urban foxes to ensure the species’ survival should kit fox populations completely collapse elsewhere.

Today, those Bakersfield kit foxes are under siege, suffering from an outbreak of highly infectious sarcoptic mange. Mange – a skin condition caused by parasitic mites -- leads to hair loss, open wounds from scratching and, ultimately, death. The first case was detected among the kit fox population in March 2013, and since then, more than 200 cases have been documented. The epidemic has grown worse every year.

Given the importance of the Bakersfield population, CDFW, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, the California State University, Stanislaus, the University of California, Davis (UCD), and various nonprofit wildlife groups have all joined forces to combat the mange.

Jaime Rudd, an environmental scientist in CDFW’s Wildlife Investigations Lab in Sacramento, is leading CDFW’s efforts while simultaneously writing her UCD Ph.D. dissertation on the outbreak. Rudd is researching ways to prevent mange from spreading to healthy animals, and assisting Stanislaus State’s Endangered Species Recovery Program with trapping and treating diseased foxes.

Severely diseased kit foxes are trapped and transported to the California Living Museum, a Bakersfield wildlife rehabilitation facility and zoo. There, the kit foxes are hospitalized, given life-saving antibiotics and fluids and treated with a topical pet product that kills the mites. The foxes often need months of treatment before they are healthy enough to release. And although the intervention saves individual lives, the process is costly and time-consuming – and doesn’t prevent the treated fox from getting mange a second or third time.

Rudd is making good use of her undergraduate degree in molecular biology, analyzing the DNA of the mites to see if they might be related to those in dogs and coyotes, which could be spreading the mange to the foxes.

“Essentially, we want to look at their molecular signature to see if these mites are related,” Rudd said.

Rudd is studying a group of wild kit foxes living on the CSU Bakersfield campus, which no doubt are supplementing their diet with burger bits and pizza crusts discarded by college students. Rudd is monitoring the group with trail cameras, outfitting some foxes with radio tracking collars and others with the type of preventative flea and tick collar you might use on a pet dog or cat.

“We want to evaluate the efficacy of these collars,” she said. “If they’re only going to work for two months, the collars won’t help us slow down the spread of mange, so is it really worth the effort of putting them on? But if they’re going to work for five months or more, then it might be worth the effort.”

If there is any hope sustaining Rudd and her colleagues in this important, though often disheartening, work, it’s this: “The fact we are not seeing mange in the outlying populations is cause for optimism,” she said. “If nothing else, we can at least try to keep it from leaving the city.”